This is not meant to demean the Wikipedia project, which is one of humanity's finest creation and for which I have the utmost respect, simply to point out a glaring issue with some of its editorial choices.
Image transcriptions
[Wikipedia's logo is speaking to us]
Did you know Wikipedia is a truly neutral encyclopedia which strives hard to have zero ideological bias
[purple is browsing the Wikipedia page "Mass killings under communist states"]
Very informative page, I can't wait to learn more on this topic and the history of the world in general
[purple is asking a question]
So I'm assuming you've got similar articles for mass killings under capitalist, or fascist, or colonial states, right?
[Wikipedia's logo shrugs and gives us a cheeky grin]
![[Wikipedia's logo is speaking to us]
Did you know Wikipedia is a truly neutral encyclopedia which strives hard to have zero ideological bias](./../img/comics/wikipedia_can_have_a_bias_en_1.png "Comic image - transcription in alt text")
![[purple is browsing the Wikipedia page "Mass killings under communist states"]
Very informative page, I can't wait to learn more on this topic and the history of the world in general](./../img/comics/wikipedia_can_have_a_bias_en_2.png "Comic image - transcription in alt text")
![[purple is asking a question]
So I'm assuming you've got similar articles for mass killings under capitalist, or fascist, or colonial states, right?](./../img/comics/wikipedia_can_have_a_bias_en_3.png "Comic image - transcription in alt text")
![[Wikipedia's logo shrugs and gives us a cheeky grin]](./../img/comics/wikipedia_can_have_a_bias_en_4.png "Comic image - transcription in alt text")
